People often ask me how I manage a 40-person platform engineering organization and the entire R&D Site at the same time, a few side gigs that grow into startups, and still log 1,500km a year training for running races.
The assumption is usually that I have some secret productivity hack or that I’m just working all the time. But working harder is a trap.
Some time ago, I successfully negotiated a transition to a four-day workweek. My team’s output didn’t drop. The expectations placed on me didn’t shrink. I didn’t step back from leadership—I simply stepped away from the noise.
I made it because I am fundamentally a maker, a creator, and a designer. I needed the autonomy to build things on my own terms.
Pulling this off required proving to the business that my value wasn’t tied to the number of days I sat at my desk, but to the tangible, high-leverage outcomes I delivered.
The idea behind my system - the Leader’s Week is simple: focus on a single week, plan those days ruthlessly at the beginning, and objectively sum up the impact at the end.
This framework isn’t just another productivity hack. It is how you shift from being a reactive implementer to a proactive problem-solver. It is the ultimate tool for earning the trust and autonomy required to take control of your schedule.
First-level managers—Tech Leaders, Engineering Managers, or Team Leaders—are the linchpins of any tech organization. Your difficult job is to mix hands-on technical reality with strategic business thinking.
But here is where many leaders get it wrong: they treat their teams as simple implementers. A backlog of tickets comes in, and code goes out.
To truly maximize your impact, you need to cultivate a “product sense” within your team. Engineers must be treated as partners in product discovery, not just a delivery mechanism. First and foremost, you need to ensure the team is solving actual business problems, not just writing code for the sake of interesting architecture.
What if you lead a backend, DevOps, or platform team that doesn’t build customer-facing features? The mindset doesn’t change. You are still building a product; your customers are simply internal developers, and your metrics are reliability, developer experience, and deployment speed.
If the “why” behind your projects isn’t clear, you need to anchor your team to the four factors essential to the success of any business.
Every problem you solve should map to one of these:
Growth: Reaching new customers and expanding market share. (e.g., Optimizing an onboarding flow, or ensuring the backend scales to handle a 5x traffic spike).
Expansion: Offering new products and services to existing customers. (e.g., Shipping a highly requested feature, or abstracting a service so it can be reused in a new market).
Profitability: Ensuring you have the resources to continue operating. (e.g., Slashing AWS costs, migrating from expensive enterprise software to an open-source alternative, or automating manual QA).
Customer Satisfaction: Ensuring customers keep coming back. (e.g., Fixing critical bugs, reducing latency by 200ms, or achieving 99.99% uptime).
When planning key initiatives for a week, start with this assessment:
Ask yourself: Are we just writing code, or are we driving Growth, Expansion, Profitability, or Customer Satisfaction?
Once you know which of the four business factors you are targeting, you have to measure your success correctly.
In product-minded engineering, the effort you put in is just a cost. The code you write is a liability. The only thing that actually matters is the outcome you achieve.
You can build the most theoretically perfect, hype-driven microservice architecture in the world, but if it doesn’t solve a user problem or move a business metric, it was a waste of a week.
So, what does an actionable outcome look like?
Increased conversion by X% (e.g., The drop-out rate of the sign-up flow went down by 10% after rewriting the validation logic).
Increased revenue by Y% (e.g., Enabled Stripe integration for 3 new European markets, unlocking new MRR).
Reduced infrastructure cost by Z% (e.g., Optimized database queries and adjusted auto-scaling, dropping monthly cloud spend by 20%).
Increased iteration speed (e.g., Cut CI/CD pipeline build times from 45 minutes to 8 minutes, allowing developers to ship 5x faster).
Notice there are almost no technicalities in the primary objectives. You must always know the tangible good you are bringing to your customers or the company.
When you sit down to plan your Leader’s Week, write these outcomes at the very top. Then, list the specific engineering initiatives that will get you there.
Example:
If the outcome is “Reduce infrastructure costs by 15%,” your key initiatives for the week might be:
Identify and shut down orphaned staging environments.
Refactor the 3 most expensive database queries identified in Datadog.
Migrate image storage to a cheaper bucket tier.
At the end of the week, you don’t judge yourself on how many hours you spent looking at AWS dashboards.
You judge yourself by the outcome: Did the daily spend drop?
When you step into the office on Monday morning, the easiest thing to do is open Slack, check your email, or look at the latest alerts.
Do not do this.
The moment you open those channels, your week is no longer yours. You become reactive, immediately pulled into other people’s priorities, urgent-but-unimportant fires, and administrative noise.
Think of this like building a physical product. A maker does not start cutting material or firing up the 3D printer without a finished CAD model. As a leader, your week is the material. You cannot start executing without a blueprint.
Planning the week must be the absolute first thing you do. Block the first 30 to 45 minutes of Monday morning in your calendar. During this time, you are unreachable. You sit down with your long-term objectives, your strategic context, and your Leader’s Week template. You define the value of the next tens of hours before a single line of code is written or a single 1:1 is held.
If figuring out your plan takes longer than an hour—for instance, because priorities are muddy or you lack strategic clarity—then getting that clarity becomes your first actionable goal.
There is only one, single, non-negotiable priority for the week.
This is the hardest rule for leaders to accept, but it is the most vital lesson of this framework. When you operate with severe time constraints—like a four-day work week—you cannot afford the illusion of multitasking. If you have five priorities, you have none. You will end Friday having moved five things 10% of the way to completion, generating zero actual value.
Your One Priority is the initiative that, if absolutely nothing else gets done by the end of the week, still makes the week a success.
Because it is the most important thing, it requires the most protected resource you have: uninterrupted deep work.
You must carve out at least 8 hours in your week dedicated solely to this subject. Do not sprinkle this across 30-minute gaps between meetings. Block out massive chunks of time—like two 4-hour sessions—to immerse yourself entirely. Whether that is drafting a critical architectural document, untangling a complex scaling issue, or mapping out the next quarter’s product expansion, this time is sacred.
Once the One Priority is locked in, the rest of the week falls into place through aggressive timeboxing:
Two Secondary Targets: Pick exactly two other important things that require your attention (e.g., unblocking a specific team, resolving a structural tech-debt issue). Box 2 hours of total focus for each.
The Radar: Pick three or four essential things to simply monitor. These are KPIs, deployment health checks, or team status updates. You are building awareness, not doing deep work here.
Timebox Everything: Put these blocks directly into your calendar. A task without a calendar block is just a wish.
It is incredibly tempting to fill your available working hours entirely with planned blocks. This is a recipe for catastrophic failure.
In engineering, systems running at 100% utilization queue up requests and eventually crash. Your calendar works the exact same way. If your week is fully booked, a single production incident or urgent stakeholder request will cascade, destroying your entire plan.
If you follow the Leader’s Week framework, your planned priorities will consume about 15 to 20 hours.
That is intentional.
The remaining time is your slack. It absorbs the shocks of firefighting, allows for unstructured learning, and most importantly, guarantees you are actually available for your people when they need you. A leader with no slack is a bottleneck.
Many leaders skip the weekly assessment. They are so exhausted by the week’s sprint that they simply slam their laptops shut the moment the weekend begins.
But skipping the review turns this entire framework into a chore rather than a high-value feedback loop. Unreflected work leads to burnout and repeated mistakes.
The end-of-week assessment is not a report card for your boss; it is a mirror for you. It is the exact mechanism that gives you the peace of mind to completely disconnect. When you know exactly what you accomplished, what went wrong, and what you are leaving for next week, you can step away and recharge.
When assessing yourself, look beyond the code, the pull requests, and the Jira boards. High-performing teams are built by leaders who exhibit specific, observable behaviors.
I use the five characteristics of transformational leadership (from the DORA research and the book Accelerate) to run a quick system check on my own behavior:
Visionary: Did I connect our current, messy technical slog to the 6-month product vision?
Inspirational Communication: Did I frame a recent failure as a system flaw to learn from, rather than a human error?
Intellectual Stimulation: Did I challenge my team to rethink an old architectural problem, or did I just hand them the answer?
Supportive Leadership: Did I actively clear a blocker for a struggling engineer?
Personal Recognition: Who did I explicitly and publicly praise this week?
Return to the outcomes you defined on Monday morning. Did the needle actually move?
You don’t need a complex dashboard for this. Mark your key initiatives simply:
🟢 On track
🟠 At risk
🔴 Off track
If your “One Priority” is constantly glowing red week after week, you don’t have a time management problem—you have a strategic alignment or resourcing problem. This reality check makes that structural issue visible before it becomes a crisis.
As makers, creators, and problem-solvers, we have a terrible habit of constantly moving the goalposts. The moment a complex feature ships, a migration finishes, or a nasty bug is squashed, we immediately look at the next mountain.
“It was just a small refactor.”
“It was expected of us anyway.”
Stop rejecting your accomplishments.
The things that feel like “business as usual” today were likely complex, out-of-reach challenges just a few months ago.
Documenting these wins—no matter how small—is the ultimate antidote to imposter syndrome. It builds a historical ledger of your team’s momentum.
Distractions are bugs in the operating system of your week.
Sometimes they are loud, like a Sev-1 production incident. More often, they are silent killers: recurring status meetings with no agenda, slow CI/CD pipelines, or fragmented communication across too many Slack channels.
Naming these distractors is the first step to eliminating them. If you notice that “ad-hoc requests from stakeholders” derailed your deep-work block three weeks in a row, you now have the actionable data needed to build a new intake process. You transition from complaining about the noise to engineering it out of your system.
The Leader’s Week is a simple framework, but it requires a tangible artifact to work. You cannot hold this all in your head.
Although we live in a digital-first world, I highly recommend printing the Leader’s Week template. Using a physical pen takes away browser-based distractions and gives you a permanent, physical record of your progress to reflect back on.
Leadership can be incredibly loud.
If you aren’t careful, the organization will consume every hour you are willing to give it. You will reach the end of Friday exhausted, looking at a calendar full of meetings, wondering what you actually built.
But you are not just a manager. You are a maker. A creator. A designer of systems.
And makers need space.
Implementing the Leader’s Week wasn’t just about becoming a more effective leader. It was the exact mechanism that allowed me to compress my corporate responsibilities into four days. It gave me the leverage to step back, protect my creative energy, and spend my Fridays building my own projects and being fully present for my family.
You don’t have to negotiate a four-day workweek to find value in this framework. But you do need to stop letting the week happen to you.
Next Monday morning, before you open Slack. Before you check your email. Sit down with a blank piece of paper.
Pick your one priority. Draw the boundary. And take your time back.
More on Human Jira Router based on Anthropic’s announcements
Leader-Follower model based on David Marquet’s book
Your job is to focus on the right things and why the Hard Work is Overrated
This post is about the physical laws of backpressure in software systems, latency death spirals, and why unbounded queues are a bug. Editor’s note: This is a guest post by Peter Mbanugo (originally published on Peter’s blog). Peter will be speaking at P99 CONF 2026. His topic: Multi-Core Without the Trilemma: Escaping Async/Await, Mutexes, and GC. Register now — the conference is free and…